Termite Lawyer in Cleveland, SC

Ask Us Anything

When you choose Cobb Hammett for a termite damage attorney in Cleveland, SC, you can rest easy knowing you're in confident, capable hands. Clients trust our law firm for termite damage cases because we have:

  • A Demonstrated Playbook of Strategies
  • A Proven Track Record of Successful Termite Cases
  • Substantial Termite Evidence Lockers with Experts and Depositions
  • Experience Handling Cases Across the Southeast United States
  • Manuals for Many Major Termite Control Companies

Unlike some termite damage law firms, our lawyers study the practices and policies of large termite control and home inspection companies. We use creative strategies to avoid unfair arbitration clauses and have devoted real resources to solving our client's claims.

Simply put, you can trust our termite damage attorneys with your case because we genuinely care about you as our client.

Whether you're a homeowner, commercial property owner, or a homeowner's association, know that you're not alone. If termites are causing damage to your property, don't let giant pest control chains or home inspection franchises take advantage of you. The cost of repairs should fall where it should - on the shoulders of the home inspection company, pest control company, or their insurers.

What Are the Signs of Termite Damage?

It's not always easy to spot the signs of termite damage, especially if you're an average person without much knowledge of the termite species. Plus, termites often wreak havoc in unseen areas like drywall, siding, and the framing of your house, so seeing damage isn't always easy. Despite those challenges, there are some common signs and areas for you to consider.

Some common signs of termite damage include:

  • Termite Swarms in Your Home
  • Discarded Termite Wings in Crawlspaces, Attics, or Other Areas
  • Small Holes or Pin Pricks in Walls
  • Mud Tunnels Running Along the Outer Walls of Your House
  • Dirt Falling Out of Cracks, Power Outlets, or Holes in Walls
  • Warped Doors and Windows

Some of the most common areas where termites do damage include:

  • In and Around Chimneys
  • Around the Bases of Outside Walls
  • In the Floors or Walls of Your Attic
  • In Your Crawlspace
  • Laundry, Bath, and Utility Rooms
  • The Floors and Sinks of Your Kitchen or Bathroom
  • Hollowed Out Wooden Areas Around Your Home

What Should I Do if I Find Termite Damage?

If you find termite damage in your home, it's best not to try and fix it yourself. Why? First, repairing damage from termites is a complicated, painstaking endeavor that requires a skilled, tedious approach. Spotting termite damage and knowing how to fix it requires a deep knowledge of how termites behave and live to get rid of them. Second, and perhaps most importantly, taking a DIY approach to termite damage may ruin your termite lawsuit.

That's true even if you have the skills and experience to do so. You might inadvertently destroy important evidence that is key to your case, which may ruin your chances of compensation for damages and poor work. Instead of trying to repair damage on your own, get a second opinion from a trusted inspector. Once your concerns are verified, it's time to call Cobb Hammett Law Firm. Our experienced termite damage attorneys will dig into your case and discover if you're one of the thousands of people with grounds for filing a termite lawsuit.

Who Is at Fault for Termite Damage?

We get this question often at Cobb Hammett Law Firm, though the answer is sometimes unclear. What we do know is that if you're looking for the max amount of compensation, we'll need to discover who was at fault. In some cases, it's easy to determine fault. For example, if you're a new homeowner, and a termite inspector or seller didn't inform you of an infestation, you may have grounds to sue.

However, things get more complex if you rent a home or bought a residence many years ago and have been using a pest control company for termite infestation. You could have grounds for a case against the pest control company, your landlord, or a different third party, depending on the circumstances of your case. That's why working with a termite attorney in Cleveland, SC is so important - so they can investigate the details and damages associated with your infestation and determine who is accountable.

10 Common Excuses for Avoiding Termite Damage Liability

If you have trusted your home with a pest control company and encounter a termite issue, you might not get the help you expect, even if your claim is legitimate. With years of experience fighting big pest control companies and their insurers, we've heard just about every excuse in the book. If you're dealing with a termite problem, be wary if you hear any of the following excuses.

  • 01.The contract you signed releases our company of any liability.
  • 02.We can't help unless you sign a brand-new contract.
  • 03.There's moisture around the damaged areas of your home. We aren't responsible.
  • 04.We're under no obligation to discover hidden termite damage.
  • 05.We won't review your bond unless your property is re-treated.
  • 06.We don't have to pay because you have a re-treat-only contract.
  • 07.You need to pay for re-treatment because our chemicals or pesticides have worn off.
  • 08.You dug up our chemical barrier. Your infestation is not our fault.
  • 09.Our insurance company won't pay you. If you have a complaint, take it up with them.
  • 10.We'll cover the cost of fixing damage, but we won't open walls to see if more damage is present.

However, things get more complex if you rent a home or bought a residence many years ago and have been using a pest control company for termite infestation. You could have grounds for a case against the pest control company, your landlord, or a different third party, depending on the circumstances of your case. That's why working with a termite attorney in Cleveland, SC is so important - so they can investigate the details and damages associated with your infestation and determine who is accountable.

Negligence

Can I Sue a Home Inspector for Negligence?

If your home inspector did not uphold their duties and obligations to you as the home buyer, you could most certainly sue a home inspector.

Unless your termite infestation was new when your home was inspected, it would be hard for a home inspector to miss it. If you just bought a house and you have discovered damage or signs of a termite infestation, contact Cobb Hammett today. Our team of termite damage attorneys may be able to prove that your inspector failed at spotting and reporting termite issues in your new home.

However, proving negligence is easier said than done without a lawyer by your side. Termite inspectors aren't always expected to find every bit of termite damage, and they're often not the final say in whether your home is damage-free. That's why, with Cobb Hammett Law Firm as your advocate, we'll ask the hard-hitting questions needed to discover if your inspector missed termite damage for legitimate reasons or if they were careless and negligent. We'll help facilitate a second inspection if needed and will work tirelessly to earn you the compensation you deserve.

Breach

Can I Sue a Home Inspector for Breach of Contract?

You should know that even if your home inspector is legally negligent for missing termite damage or infestations, their liability will often be limited due to the language in their contract.

If your lawsuit doesn't have the proper foundation to prove negligence, your termite damage lawyer in Cleveland, SC may be able to win compensation via breach of contract. In many circumstances, this is the best route to take if it's easier to prove that an inspector violated a contract. For example, suppose the home inspection contract you signed called for a whole-home inspection, and the inspector failed to survey your crawlspace or attic. In that case, you may have a viable claim in court.

At Cobb Hammett Law Firm, we understand that every termite damage case situation is different. As such, we approach every case with a nuanced, multi-faceted strategy crafted with your best interests in mind.

Cobb Hammett Is Here When You Need Us Most

When a termite prevention company or home inspector is negligent and causes damage to your home, it's time to act fast. You need a trustworthy termite attorney in cityname, state by your side to take the proper steps toward getting compensation.

When you depend on Cobb Hammett, LLC, you'll receive personalized attention and proactive representation. That's because we make an intentional decision to limit our law firm's overall caseload. This allows us to better focus on our individual clients, many of whom remain with us for generations. We do not pass off cases to paralegals or junior associates but rather prioritize the attorney-client relationship.

We value compassion and integrity, and our practice reflects those values. If you're ready to take a stand, call our office today. Our termite damage lawyers will help create a better future for you, your family, or your business.

Don't hesitate to ask

Law is complicated matter. It can cause you a big problem if you ignore it. Let us help you!

Latest News in Cleveland, SC

Cleveland forfeits real estate license after fraud

Local developer Arthur Cleveland, whose ownership of the Spartanburg Marriott at Renaissance Park has been clouded by controversy for several years, has signed a consent order agreeing to forfeit his real estate license for a period of three years.The reason is two separate, but related, cases of fraud.Cleveland has been besieged by foreclosures and losses in the past few years. In addition to the Marriott property, Broadwalk, the Montgomery building, his personal home and many other parcels have been either lost...

Local developer Arthur Cleveland, whose ownership of the Spartanburg Marriott at Renaissance Park has been clouded by controversy for several years, has signed a consent order agreeing to forfeit his real estate license for a period of three years.

The reason is two separate, but related, cases of fraud.

Cleveland has been besieged by foreclosures and losses in the past few years. In addition to the Marriott property, Broadwalk, the Montgomery building, his personal home and many other parcels have been either lost or threatened through court proceedings.

The legal problems relating to his real estate license are tied to a 400-acre parcel of land known as Meadow Farms.

Cleveland and his company, Cleveland-White, had a management agreement with a group that owned Meadow Farms to manage, rent, lease and operate the property, beginning in 1997.

According to court documents, Cleveland withdrew $8,000 from the Meadow Farms account on March 21, 2002, without authorization, for a loan to Renaissance Park Inc.

Two of the Meadow Farms owners (there are 15 to 20 individuals and trusts that own the property jointly), looking into that $8,000 disappearance, discovered a larger fraud.

Eight days after he took the $8,000, Cleveland received a check from the city of Spartanburg for Meadow Farms for just over $118,000 in return for some land sold for utility right-of-ways, but Cleveland never gave the money to the owners.

Instead, Cleveland testified in the Spartanburg County Court of Common Pleas in 2005 that he put the money into a project he owned called Hartsville Crossing.

Cleveland later sold his interest in Hartsville Crossing, but never repaid the $118,000 or, according to court records, $2 million in other debts related to the Hartsville Crossing project.

On March 17, Circuit Judge Doyet Early III ruled Cleveland committed fraud and said he "showed neither remorse nor explanation" for his actions.

Cleveland and Cleveland-White Co. jointly were ordered to pay $148,000 in actual damages, and Cleveland was

ordered to pay an additional $15,000 in punitive damages.

These facts were outlined in the complaint against Cleveland that was to go before the S.C. Real Estate Commission this past month.

According to Real Estate Commission spokesman Jim Knight, the paperwork on Cleveland's agreement to relinquish his license is not complete, but Cleveland and his attorney, Ken Anthony, have signed their part of the deal.

"Once the consent order is in place, it will mean Mr. Cleveland, while he can still own Cleveland-White, cannot be the broker in charge or do any real estate transactions for the company," Knight said.

Cleveland signed the order Nov. 14 to avoid a hearing before the Real Estate Commission.

In late 2005, the owners of Meadow Farms, still unable to collect what they were owed, had Cleveland back in court, grilling him on his assets.

Cleveland, who has estimated his own fortune prior to beginning the Marriott deal at $10 million to $12 million, told the court he had no income except what he derived from refinancing property he owned. He agreed with the suggestion he was living by "robbing Peter to pay Paul" and testified that his wife's family was providing the money to pay the mortgage on his Converse Heights home.

On Friday, one of the Meadow Farms owners said the group has received "only a tiny portion" of the money Cleveland took from them.

Last month, Cleveland put Marriott-owner Renaissance Park Hotel LLC into bankruptcy to forestall a foreclosure by mortgage-holder Bridgeview LLC.

Bridgeview is owed about $23 million on the hotel, while the city of Spartanburg is responsible for about $20 million in payments over the next two decades for debt related to the hotel.

Funds to meet the city's obligations are expected to come from rent loan payments and taxes paid by the Marriott.

One thing not in doubt is the day-to-day operations of the hotel. Atlanta-based Bridgeview, the city and Marriott all share the desire that it should stay open. They agree the hotel is doing good business.

Additionally, a federal bankruptcy judge ordered on Nov. 3 that the hotel will continue to operate under the Marriott flag while the bankruptcy is sorted out.

Lane Filler can be reached at 562-7426 or [email protected].

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.